Sri Lanka has set aside the funds US$ 500 million required for the upcoming international bond settlement due in less than two weeks, without going for debt restructuring or extending the date of repayment with the consent of debt holders.
The Central Bank has taken this decision in accordance with Governor Ajith Nivard Cabraal’s unorthodox batting in difficult wickets.
He has resorted to this ove similar to hit out or get out display without following techniques just weeks after Fitch Ratings downgraded the sovereign deeper into the junk category.
This move followed the heightened debt default concerns amid razor thin foreign exchange reserves.
Sri Lanka is due to repay two International Sovereign Bonds (ISBs) maturing this year and the first one worth of US $ 500 million falls due on January 18, while the other one worth of US $ 1.0 billion is coming for settlement in July.
According to Central Bank Governor Ajith Nivard Cabraal, the country has already allocated the required funds to retire the bond this month.
He didn’t specify how the Central Bank got the means to allocate the funds but the reports came out during the weekend.
He suggested that the US $ 1.9 billion package, consisting of a US $ 400 million swap, US $ 500 million oil financing facility and another US $ 1,000 million worth of bilateral loan from India is expected within this month.
According to the reports, any one of the funding could materialise as early as January 10.
Sri Lanka last week extended the US $ 200 million three-month swap the country’s Central Bank has with its Bangladeshi counterpart by another term.
Another billion dollar swap is in the works with the Qatar Central Bank, yet no timeline given for its receipt or if at all it would work out remains uncertain. Currently, Cabraal is in Qatar, holding talks with his counterpart.
Meanwhile, Dr. Nishan De Mel, an economist and Executive Director at Verite Research, an independent policy think tank based in Colombo, said during the weekend that the country shouldn’t settle the upcoming bond payment on January 18, instead must engage with the bondholders for debt restructuring.
Explaining the rationale behind why Sri Lanka should tread on the suggested path, he said it would leave the country with foreign exchange for critical needs such as imports, which would be less calamitous than lacking dollars for imports.
According to him, Sri Lanka is already living a post-default-like way of life as the essential imports are curtailed to save reserves to pay ISBs, which according to him, is a poor strategy with no end in sight.
“Concluding negotiation will typically take at least six months. Ecuador and Argentina did that in that time frame in 2020 and came out of the bind,” Dr. De Mel said in his new year resolutions for the Sri Lankan economy, on January 1.