Showers or thundershowers may occur at several places in Western, Sabaragamuwa, Northwestern and Uva provinces and in Galle, Matara, Kandy and Nuwara-Eliya districts after 1.00 pm.

Mainly dry weather will prevail over the other parts of the island.

Misty conditions can be expected at some places in Central, Sabaragamuwa and Uva provinces and in Galle, Matara, Kaluthara and Kurunegala districts during the early hours of the morning.

The general public is kindly requested to take adequate precautions to minimize damages caused by temporary localized strong winds and lightning during thundershowers.

By Adolf

Can the UN stop Trump’s ill-conceived Dreams? The answer is NO . Then why do we need a UN? 

The United Nations (UN) is the world’s foremost international organization, created in 1945 to maintain international peace and security, promote cooperation, human rights, development, and humanitarian relief. However, in recent years there has been growing debate about its effectiveness and cost — especially given ongoing global conflicts. Some critics argue the UN has failed to prevent or resolve major disputes, while others point out the practical constraints the institution works under. Therefore should cut its operations by 75% . They are urging US President Trump the cowboy of international diplomacy to make this happen. 

Annual Costs of the UN

The UN’s finances are divided into several major budgets:

• Regular Budget: This covers the core operations of the Secretariat — administration, policy, human rights, development, and more. For 2026, the approved regular budget is approximately $3.45 billion.  

• Peacekeeping Budget: Separate from the regular budget, this funds peace operations in conflict zones (often visible through “blue helmets”). For the 2025-26 fiscal year, this budget is roughly $5.38 billion, down slightly from previous cycles.  

• Humanitarian and Development Funding: UN agencies like the World Food Programme, UNICEF, and the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs operate largely on voluntary contributions that can total tens of billions annually — for example, UNOCHA’s 2026 appeal was around €28 billion for humanitarian response globally.  

In total, when all agencies and programs are counted, the UN system mobilizes significant global resources each year, though direct budgets like the regular and peacekeeping ones remain under $10 billion combined. By comparison, global military spending — a proxy for what states choose to spend on defense — was estimated at about $2.7 trillion in 2024. Peacekeeping’s budget accounts for less than half of one percent of this total. 

Financial Strains and Payment Issues

The UN faces a serious financial crisis caused by unpaid contributions from member states. For example, the United States — traditionally the largest contributor — owed billions in missed payments, affecting both the regular and peacekeeping budgets. This has forced budget reductions, staff cuts, and concerns about the organization’s ability to carry out its mandates. In response to overdue payments and changing funding priorities, the UN approved budget and staffing cuts for 2026, including reducing posts by nearly 19% in the regular budget. 

Criticism of Effectiveness

Many critics argue the UN has struggled to prevent or effectively manage major conflicts:

• In Ukraine, the Security Council’s structure — with veto powers for permanent members — has limited strong collective action, particularly when one permanent member is directly involved.

• In Venezuela, political and humanitarian crises have persisted for years, with limited UN success in catalyzing lasting solutions.

• Discussions about Middle Eastern tensions — including with Iran — highlight broader geopolitical limitations where member states pursue differing interests.

These conflicts have had devastating impacts on civilians’ lives and livelihoods. Critics point to these outcomes as evidence the UN’s peace and security architecture needs reform.

However, defenders of the UN note the organization’s mandate is not to substitute sovereign decision-making by member states or to act like a global government with military enforcement powers. Peacekeeping missions, for example, operate where invited or mandated, and lack independent military force. They also point to situations in which UN missions have contributed to de-escalation, humanitarian aid delivery, protection of civilians, and post-conflict reconstruction — albeit imperfectly.

Debate on Reform

Calls for serious reform — including reducing bureaucracy — have persisted for decades. Some proposals include:

• Streamlining administrative overhead and overlapping mandates.

• Making peacekeeping mandates more realistic and focused.

• Reforming financing mechanisms to ensure reliability and equity.

• Pruning the benefits of the Staff and their families 

Some policymakers — including voices from the United States in recent years — argue for redirecting 75% of theefforts toward regional bodies or institutions like the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and World Bank for development and economic support. Whether these replace or complement UN functions is a subject of ongoing discussion.Proponents of reform argue cost reductions and efficiency are overdue; opponents caution that the alternative — a world without a central platform for diplomacy and cooperation — could reduce global coordination on critical issues like humanitarian crises, climate change, and refugee support.

Total Failure 

In summary, the UN costs member countries billions each year and faces both financial and operational challenges and incompetence . While there are legitimate debates about its effectiveness in specific conflicts, the organization also continues to play a ineffective role in diplomacy, humanitarian assistance, and peace support. Reform advocates stress efficiency and relevance, while supporters warn that simply dismantling the UN risks losing a unique forum for international cooperation unless the effective areas of the UN is delegated to other agencies. Unfortunately the UN is miserably failing and needs total overhaul or shutdown of its bureaucracy.

The decision by British Airways to resume direct flights between London Gatwick and Colombo from October 23, 2026, is being hailed as a boost for Sri Lanka’s connectivity—but it is also raising serious questions about competition, national carrier stability, and governance.

The new service, operating three times weekly with Boeing 777 aircraft, marks the airline’s return after years of absence. While the move is expected to stimulate tourism and strengthen links with the United Kingdom, analysts warn it could significantly disrupt the fragile recovery of SriLankan Airlines.

The Colombo–London route has long been one of SriLankan Airlines’ most profitable sectors, particularly for premium passengers. British Airways’ re-entry introduces direct competition for this high-yield market, potentially diverting lucrative business and premium economy travelers. With competitive pricing already announced—economy fares starting around £620 and business class exceeding $3,700 the UK carrier is clearly targeting both leisure and corporate segments.

The timing is particularly sensitive. SriLankan Airlines is currently navigating operational disruptions linked to Middle East tensions, which have forced cancellations of several regional routes. In response, the airline has been deploying additional flights to London to manage passenger demand, making the UK route even more critical to its revenue stream.

At the same time, the Government has abandoned privatization efforts and is pursuing a state-led restructuring of the airline. This includes a $210 million debt overhaul and an ambitious five-year plan aimed at expanding fleet capacity, increasing market share, and restoring profitability. Early indicators show some recovery, with passenger numbers and revenues rising, but the airline remains financially vulnerable.

Against this backdrop, the entry of a globally recognized carrier like British Airways presents a double-edged sword. On one hand, increased seat capacity and brand visibility could drive higher tourist arrivals from the UK. On the other, intensified competition could erode the national carrier’s margins at a critical stage of its recovery.

Industry observers note that while competition can improve service quality and pricing, SriLankan Airlines may struggle to match the scale, network connectivity, and brand strength of its British rival. This imbalance could shift market dynamics in favor of the foreign carrier unless the local airline accelerates its restructuring efforts.

Ultimately, the return of British Airways underscores both opportunity and risk. It highlights Sri Lanka’s growing appeal as a destination while exposing the vulnerabilities of its aviation sector. The coming months will be crucial in determining whether SriLankan Airlines can withstand this competitive pressure or whether the market will tilt decisively toward international players.

Sri Lanka’s tourism industry is recalibrating its strategy with a sharp pivot toward India’s high-value travel segments, aiming to offset potential shocks from Middle East instability. As geopolitical tensions disrupt traditional travel hubs, authorities are moving quickly to capture a lucrative market of corporate events and destination weddings.

Led by the Sri Lanka Tourism Promotion Bureau, the campaign includes a series of roadshows across major Indian cities such as Chennai, Kolkata, and Ahmedabad. These cities represent key outbound travel markets with strong corporate bases and affluent populations.

At the centre of the strategy is the growing MICE segment meetings, incentives, conferences, and exhibitions alongside the booming destination wedding industry. Both segments are known for significantly higher spending compared to traditional leisure tourism, making them critical for Sri Lanka’s revenue ambitions.

The timing is strategic. Long favoured destinations such as Dubai are facing operational uncertainties linked to regional tensions, prompting Indian corporates and high-net-worth families to reconsider their options. Sri Lanka is positioning itself as a stable, culturally familiar, and logistically convenient alternative.

A major boost to this effort is the introduction of a new direct air route by SriLankan Airlines connecting Colombo with Ahmedabad. Gujarat, one of India’s wealthiest states, is known for its large-scale corporate events and extravagant weddings, often involving hundreds of guests and multi-day celebrations.

Tourism officials believe that improved connectivity will unlock access to this high-spending demographic. Combined with Sri Lanka’s proximity to India and shared cultural elements, the island offers a compelling proposition for event planners seeking exotic yet accessible destinations.

India already dominates Sri Lanka’s tourism arrivals, accounting for roughly a quarter of visitors. By deepening engagement with niche segments, authorities hope to increase not just arrivals, but also per capita spending—a key metric for sustainable tourism growth.

However, this ambitious push is not without risks. The same geopolitical instability that creates opportunity could also undermine global travel confidence. A prolonged crisis in the Middle East may affect airline routes, fuel prices, and overall travel sentiment, indirectly impacting Sri Lanka’s tourism flows.

Moreover, industry stakeholders caution that success in the MICE and wedding segments requires more than marketing. Infrastructure, service quality, and seamless coordination across hotels, transport providers, and event planners are critical to delivering high-end experiences.

Sri Lanka’s strategy reflects a broader shift from volume-driven tourism to value-driven growth. If executed effectively, the focus on India’s premium segments could provide a crucial buffer against external shocks. But with global uncertainty looming, the industry’s ability to adapt quickly will determine whether this opportunity translates into lasting gains.

Sri Lanka’s economic recovery faces a fresh test as global energy prices surge amid escalating tensions in the Middle East, but Fitch Ratings believes the country is unlikely to face an immediate downgrade. Instead, analysts warn that the shock could slow the steady progress made since the 2022 financial collapse.

According to Fitch, Sri Lanka remains highly exposed to oil price volatility, yet the current crisis is more likely to weaken recent gains rather than trigger a sharp deterioration in its sovereign credit profile. The agency’s APAC Sovereign Ratings team emphasized that the duration of the global energy shock will be the decisive factor in determining its long-term impact.

The comparison with the Sri Lankan economic crisis 2022 is unavoidable. That period saw soaring energy costs devastate public finances and foreign reserves, pushing the country into a “Restricted Default” rating. Since then, Sri Lanka has clawed its way back to a “CCC+” rating, reflecting hard-won macroeconomic stability.

Fitch analysts argue that today’s conditions are notably different. A key improvement is the country’s external position. Sri Lanka recorded a current account surplus last year a stark contrast to the deep deficits seen in 2022. This buffer is expected to absorb some of the pressure from rising import costs, even as higher oil prices widen the trade gap.

However, the risks are far from contained. The transmission channels are multiple and interconnected. Costlier fuel imports could strain the trade balance, while economic disruptions in Gulf countries may reduce remittance inflows from Sri Lankan workers abroad. Tourism, another vital source of foreign exchange, could also weaken if global uncertainty intensifies.

On the fiscal front, the Government’s room for maneuver remains constrained under its agreement with the International Monetary Fund. While some flexibility could be negotiated if the crisis deepens, for now policymakers are limited in their ability to cushion the economic blow through subsidies or spending increases.

 Fitch does not foresee a major fiscal collapse, but it cautions that the energy shock could stall near-term improvements. This comes at a particularly difficult time, as Sri Lanka is still recovering from recent natural disasters that have added pressure on public finances.

Encouragingly, foreign exchange reserves have been gradually improving, providing an additional layer of protection. These buffers, combined with ongoing reforms, suggest that Sri Lanka is better equipped to handle external shocks than it was four years ago.

Still, the outlook remains delicate. The country’s recovery trajectory depends heavily on external stability something largely beyond its control. If energy prices remain elevated for an extended period, Sri Lanka’s fragile gains could erode, leaving its economy once again exposed to global volatility.

While authorities project confidence over liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) availability, a closer look reveals underlying vulnerabilities that could place Sri Lanka at risk of a broader energy shortage in the coming months. Recent shipments have temporarily stabilized supply, but systemic weaknesses in planning and stock management remain unresolved.

Sri Lanka has imported approximately 38,000 metric tons of LPG in March, with an additional 33,000 metric tons expected shortly. Another shipment is scheduled within days, and further deliveries are planned for April. These inflows are expected to meet immediate domestic demand, easing fears of an imminent gas shortage.

However, this steady stream of imports highlights a deeper dependency on continuous supply rather than a resilient reserve system. Unlike global best practices, which emphasize maintaining strategic buffer stocks, Sri Lanka appears to rely heavily on just-in-time procurement. This approach leaves little room for error, particularly in the face of potential disruptions in international shipping or supply chains.

The situation becomes more concerning when viewed alongside the country’s broader energy landscape. Fuel reserves are already under pressure, with diesel stocks critically low and refinery output declining. The diversion of fuel for power generation further underscores the interconnected nature of Sri Lanka’s energy challenges. A disruption in one sector could quickly cascade into others, including LPG distribution.

Government assurances that the risk of a gas crisis is minimal may hold true in the short term. However, analysts warn that these projections depend heavily on timely arrivals of scheduled shipments. Any delays whether due to geopolitical tensions, logistical constraints, or supplier issues could rapidly destabilize the market.

Critics point to a lack of foresight in securing long-term agreements with LPG-producing countries. Weak communication and limited strategic engagement have reduced Sri Lanka’s bargaining power, making it more vulnerable to fluctuations in global supply and pricing.

Additionally, the absence of a robust buffer stock policy means the country lacks a safety net in times of crisis. Even though infrastructure exists to store significant quantities, underutilization and poor maintenance have limited its effectiveness.

As global uncertainties loom, particularly in energy-producing regions, Sri Lanka’s reliance on continuous imports appears increasingly risky. The current flow of LPG shipments may prevent immediate shortages, but it does little to address the structural deficiencies in energy security.

Without decisive action to build reserves, improve infrastructure, and strengthen international partnerships, Sri Lanka could face a dual crisis fuel and LPG shortages within a short span. The warning signs are already visible, and the cost of inaction could be severe.

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa has urged the Government to provide immediate relief to the public using Treasury funds, citing the growing economic hardship faced by citizens.

Speaking during the parliamentary debate on regulations under the Colombo Port City Economic Commission Act and the current global situation, Premadasa stressed that a stable and continuous electricity supply is essential to create an investment-friendly environment.

He pointed out that despite claims that there is no crisis, the country is facing serious challenges in the energy sector. Referring to the Norochcholai power plant, Premadasa said electricity generation has declined in recent days, with a reported reduction of 176 megawatts.

He noted that issues related to coal usage, including increased ash content and repeated system blockages, have further worsened the situation. According to him, ash management difficulties have led to environmental concerns, with around 800 metric tonnes of waste needing disposal daily, especially during the New Year period when cement companies that utilize fly ash remain closed.

Premadasa also highlighted the broader impact of the fuel shortage, stating that farmers, fishermen, teachers, the transport sector and industries are facing significant difficulties. He criticised the QR-based fuel distribution system, claiming it is not functioning effectively.

He warned that using fuel to compensate for reduced electricity generation could lead to higher electricity tariffs, placing additional pressure on the public.

The Opposition Leader emphasized that many people are losing income sources, with unemployment rising and poverty increasing. He called on the Government to follow the example of other countries by introducing special economic relief packages to support those most affected.

Norway has expressed its willingness to assist Sri Lanka in developing renewable energy through wind, solar and ocean wave power, officials said.

The proposal was discussed during a meeting between Agriculture, Livestock, Land and Irrigation Minister K.D. Lal Kantha and Norwegian Honorary Consul Sturle Harald Pedersen at the Agriculture Ministry.

Pedersen noted that Sri Lanka has strong potential to utilise multiple renewable energy sources, including wind, solar and tidal power, to strengthen its energy production. He also handed over a project proposal to the minister outlining possible areas of cooperation.

Discussions also focused on the agricultural sector, with emphasis on integrating renewable energy into farming activities.

Pedersen highlighted that agricultural waste could be used to generate gas, adding that Norway is interested in identifying suitable regions to implement such projects.

He further pointed out that excess solar energy generated during the daytime could be used to produce hydrogen through electrolysis, which could then serve as an alternative fuel source.

Public Health Inspectors (PHIs) are facing significant challenges due to the ongoing fuel crisis, the Public Health Inspectors’ Union of Sri Lanka has warned. In a letter to the Minister of Health, the union stated that PHIs have not been provided with a dedicated fuel quota despite carrying out essential field duties.

While expressing appreciation for the QR-based fuel distribution system, the union highlighted the absence of a priority mechanism allowing PHIs to obtain fuel without delays or long queues, which has become a major concern.

The union cautioned that the situation could disrupt critical public health functions, including disease control, inspections of food outlets, and school health services, as these duties may not be completed on time.

It further warned that if officers face pressure or disciplinary action due to these constraints, trade union action may be considered.

U.S. President Donald Trump has urged Israel not to carry out further attacks on Iran’s energy infrastructure, as escalating strikes on key facilities have sent global energy prices sharply higher.

The warning comes amid intensifying conflict between the U.S., Israel, and Iran, which began on February 28following the collapse of talks over Tehran’s nuclear programme. The war has since killed thousands, spread to neighbouring countries, and disrupted the global economy.

Trump said he personally advised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against targeting such infrastructure.

“I told him, ‘Don’t do that,’ and he won’t do that,” Trump told reporters at the White House.

The remarks followed a major escalation in the energy sector, after Iran retaliated for an الإسرائيلي strike on a key gas field by targeting Qatar’s Ras Laffan Industrial City, a facility responsible for about 20% of the world’s liquefied natural gas (LNG). The damage is expected to take years to repair.

Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia’s main Red Sea port was also attacked, highlighting the widening scope of the conflict and raising concerns over global oil and gas supply routes, particularly the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil passes.

Despite reports that the U.S. is considering deploying additional troops to the region, Trump said he has no plans to send ground forces.

“I’m not putting troops anywhere,” he said.

Prime Minister Netanyahu confirmed that Israel had acted alone in striking Iran’s South Pars gas field, and acknowledged Trump’s request to avoid similar attacks in the future.

As fighting continues, Israel reported carrying out over 130 airstrikes in Iran within 24 hours, targeting missile launchers, drones and air defence systems. Iran, in turn, launched a new wave of missiles toward Israel.

Iranian officials warned that attacks on its energy facilities have triggered “a new stage in the war,” threatening further strikes on energy infrastructure linked to the U.S. and its allies.

The conflict has sparked growing fears of a global energy crisis, with several major economies—including Britain, France, Germany, Japan and Canada—pledging readiness to help ensure safe passage through critical shipping routes and stabilise markets.

Analysts warn that prolonged disruptions could lead to a significant oil shock, with already rising fuel prices becoming a major political and economic concern worldwide.