Sri Lanka’s tourist arrivals have reached 2.25 million as of yesterday, despite a slowdown in the first two weeks of December caused by Cyclone Ditwah, a Tourism Ministry official said.

According to the Sri Lanka Tourism Development Authority (SLTDA), 212,906 tourists arrived in the country in November, marking a 15.6 per cent increase compared to the same month last year.

The Authority noted that total tourist arrivals from January to November 31, 2025, stood at 2,103,593, reflecting a growth of 16.6 per cent year-on-year. The lowest monthly arrivals were recorded in May, with 132,919 visitors.

“These figures demonstrate a strong recovery momentum in the tourism sector following the Covid-19 pandemic and the subsequent economic crisis,” the SLTDA said, highlighting a steady upward trend throughout the year.

September recorded the most significant growth, with arrivals rising by an impressive 30.2 per cent, indicating Sri Lanka’s growing success in attracting visitors during the traditional shoulder season. Strong double-digit growth was also observed in January, April, May, June, August, October, and November, pointing to consistent demand across multiple tourism periods.

Europe emerged as the leading source market in November, contributing 108,100 tourists, accounting for 50.8 per cent of total arrivals for the month. This strong European presence is attributed to favourable winter travel trends and well-established travel connections.

India remained the single largest source country, with 51,391 tourists arriving in November, followed by Russia with 24,953 visitors. The United Kingdom ranked next, with 16,915 tourists. Meanwhile, tourist arrivals in December have continued to surpass expectations, further strengthening confidence in the sector’s recovery.

Former Minister and Eelam People’s Democratic Party (EPDP) leader Douglas Devananda was arrested yesterday by the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) in connection with an ongoing investigation, police sources said.

According to the sources, Devananda was taken into custody after providing a statement to the CID regarding an incident in which his personal firearm reportedly ended up in the possession of an organised criminal gang. The firearm in question had been issued to him by the Sri Lanka Army for his personal protection in 2001.

The Sarvajana Balaya Party, led by Mr. Dilith Jayaweera, has sent a letter to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake regarding a complaint made by the Police to the Telecommunications Regulatory Commission against the Hiru Media Network.

The letter, sent by the party’s General Secretary, Attorney-at-Law Ranjan Senewiratne, states that regardless of the subject matter of the reporting in question, the appropriate response in a democratic country should be to follow a transparent and lawful process. It emphasizes that such matters should not be addressed through intimidation, or by imposing punishments and pressure that undermine lawful media practice.

The full text of the relevant letter is provided below.

By Faraz Shauketaly

They say if you want to see a disaster, look at a mountain after a landslide. But if you want to see a political disaster, just look at the Colombo Municipal Council (CMC).

Today at Turning Point, we are dissecting the high-drama defeat of the NPP’s maiden budget for the city. It wasn’t just a “no” vote; it was a public execution of the administration’s financial roadmap for 2026.

The Tally: A Three-Vote Mutiny

Let’s get straight to the numbers—because the math doesn’t lie. The budget was defeated 60 votes to 57.

• The Flipped Switch: The real story here isn’t the opposition SJB or the SLPP voting against it—that was expected. The “Turning Point” was the Sarvajana Balaya and a handful of independents. They were the kingmakers who decided to pull the rug out from under Mayor Vraîe Cally Balthazaar.

• The Mayor’s Reaction: Mayor Balthazaar didn’t go quietly. She told the chamber, “You didn’t defeat the NPP’s budget, you defeated your conscience.” It’s a powerful line, but in the brutal world of municipal politics, “conscience” doesn’t pay for garbage collection or street lighting.

The Fallout: Does the Mayor Resign?

I’ve been flooded with messages asking if the Mayor is clearing out her desk. Here is the reality:

1. The 14-Day Clock: Under the Municipal Council Ordinance, Mayor Balthazaar has a grace period. She isn’t out—yet. She has roughly two weeks to re-work the numbers, horse-trade with the independents, and present a “Version 2.0” to the council.

2. The “Deemed Resignation”: If that second attempt fails, then the law is merciless. She will be “deemed to have resigned,” and Colombo will be thrown into a leadership crisis in the middle of a national recovery.

3. The Financial Freeze: Practically speaking, the city is now on a “starvation diet.” Until a budget is passed, no new contracts can be signed. That means road repairs, drain clearing for the monsoon, and digital upgrades are all sitting in a file marked “Pending.”

Prajashakthi vs. The Central Fund: Grassroots or Gimmick?

While Town Hall is eating itself alive, the government is frantically pushing the Prajashakthi National Programmeas the “humane” face of rebuilding.

• The Digital Hook: They’ve allocated LKR 369 Millionto digitize village councils so you can “track every rupee.” It sounds lovely. But we are also being told that LKR 150,000 is being handed out to farmers for “pain of mind.”

•  

• The India Factor: Minister Jaishankar was just here, pledging USD 450 Million. A huge chunk of that—USD 100 Million in grants—is supposed to go through these community-level Prajashakthi schemes to build 7,000 houses in the hills.

The Final Word

The “Turning Point” is this: We have a government trying to manage a USD 4.1 Billion national disaster with one hand, while their own capital city council is cutting the other hand off.

Mayor Balthazaar has 14 days to find her 60th vote. If she doesn’t, the “Budget of Conscience” will be remembered as the budget that broke the NPP’s momentum in the city. Colombo deserves a plan, not a pantomime.

I’m Faraz Shauketaly. Turning Point.

Sri Lanka’s reserve management is at a critical juncture. The IMF’s latest report revising the Net International Reserves (NIR) to $2.16 billion by December 2025 underscores that the country remains vulnerable to debt shocks, particularly amid rising private credit and recent pro-cyclical interest rate cuts. Without structural changes, the economy risks repeating patterns that led to the 2019 default.

The central bank has limited room to intervene effectively. Past experiences demonstrate that rate cuts designed to stimulate credit, when not accompanied by deflationary policy measures, erode reserve accumulation and trigger currency depreciation. Analysts highlight that the Treasury’s current dependency on the central bank for dollar acquisition constrains debt repayment flexibility, leaving the economy exposed.

Pragmatic solutions are available. A dedicated dollar trading mechanism at the Treasury, alongside direct dollar taxation powers, would allow proactive reserve management. Additionally, transferring central bank profits in dollars rather than newly issued rupees would reduce inflationary pressure, safeguard reserves, and enhance debt servicing capacity.

Policy coordination between the Treasury and the central bank must prioritize debt sustainability over short-term credit expansion. Lessons from past crises show that political expediency, unchecked rate cuts, and aggressive fiscal concessions compromise macroeconomic stability. Strengthening Treasury autonomy, modernizing reserve management, and implementing quantitative controls on liquidity can prevent a repeat of prior defaults while providing credibility to Sri Lanka’s IMF program.

In essence, avoiding another default requires structural reform, operational independence, and proactive dollar management. By adopting these measures, policymakers can stabilize reserves, safeguard debt repayment capacity, and restore market confidence without undermining central bank credibility.

The continuing congestion of over 13,000 containers at the Port of Colombo exposes a deeper malaise within Sri Lanka’s trade and logistics governance policy paralysis disguised as consultation. Despite countless meetings, committees, and stakeholder engagements over the years, the core problem remains untouched.

At the latest high-level discussion involving political leaders, Customs officials, SLPA management, and industry representatives, the outcome mirrored previous encounters: proposals without execution, concerns without timelines. For traders, transporters, and shipping agents, the message is increasingly clear: talk has replaced action.

 Container congestion does not occur in isolation. It is the cumulative result of fragmented authority between Customs, OGAs, port operators, and political oversight mechanisms. Each entity exercises control over part of the process, yet no single authority bears responsibility for end-to-end clearance efficiency.

The suggestion to convert a new parking yard into a Customs examination bay underscores how reactive solutions dominate policy thinking. Instead of designing integrated clearance systems, authorities respond to crises with temporary spatial fixes moving containers from one bottleneck to another.

More damaging is the failure to modernise clearance protocols. Manual inspections, delayed delivery orders, outdated SMS notification systems, and limited operating hours continue to slow container movement. In an era where regional competitors deploy AI-based risk profiling and pre-arrival processing, Colombo remains burdened by procedural inertia.

The unresolved case of 323 containers stalled due to parliamentary-level objections highlights the blurred line between governance and operations. When political processes interfere with routine cargo clearance, uncertainty becomes systemic. For international shipping lines and transshipment clients, such unpredictability is reason enough to reconsider port choices.

Economically, the costs are substantial. Delays reduce port throughput, lower Customs revenue collection, and increase logistics expenses. Exporters already pressured by weak global demand—face shipment disruptions, while importers absorb higher costs that eventually filter into retail prices.

The CHA Traders Association’s call for outside-panel examinations at warehouses reflects a pragmatic, industry-tested solution. Yet its repeated rejection illustrates a reluctance to trust risk-based systems, even when safeguards exist.

Sri Lanka’s economic recovery strategy hinges on trade facilitation, export competitiveness, and logistics efficiency. A congested port directly contradicts these objectives. What is missing is not diagnosis, but decisive leadership empowered to override institutional resistance.

Until accountability replaces consultation, and execution replaces discussion, Colombo Port’s congestion will remain a recurring crisis quietly draining economic momentum when Sri Lanka needs efficiency the most.

Cyclone Ditwah did not merely flood towns and uproot livelihoods—it exposed the fragile intersection between climate vulnerability and institutional weakness in Sri Lanka’s disaster response architecture. According to the International Labour Organisation (ILO), economic activity equivalent to $16 billion, or 16% of GDP, was placed at risk, revealing how deeply disasters now penetrate the country’s productive core.

Unlike conventional damage estimates, the ILO relied on remote sensing and night-time light intensity to assess economic exposure, capturing real-time disruption across districts. This contrasts sharply with the World Bank’s $4.1 billion estimate, which focuses narrowly on physical damage while excluding employment losses, informal sector disruptions, and long-term recovery costs. The divergence reflects not inconsistency, but the absence of a coordinated, multi-agency assessment framework.

The labour market consequences are particularly alarming. The ILO estimates that 374,000 workers were operating in directly affected areas, risking income losses of $48 million per month. Plantation workers, smallholder farmers, and fisheries communities face extended job insecurity due to delayed rehabilitation and weak access to formal safety nets.

UNDP assessments have long warned that Sri Lanka’s social protection systems lack shock-responsiveness, especially for informal and rural workers. Ditwah reinforced this vulnerability, as relief efforts struggled to align welfare delivery with employment recovery, leaving many households dependent on short-term aid rather than sustainable income restoration.

The IMF has repeatedly highlighted that climate disasters now represent a macro-critical risk for Sri Lanka, capable of derailing fiscal consolidation and growth targets. From this standpoint, weak coordination between disaster management agencies, line ministries, and provincial authorities magnifies economic losses and raises future borrowing needs.

Although the ILO recommends employment-intensive recovery programmes and MSME support, implementation remains the key challenge. Without institutional accountability, real-time data sharing, and decentralised execution, recovery risks becoming uneven and politically mediated.

Cyclone Ditwah’s aftermath is therefore not only a test of resilience, but of governance. Unless structural coordination failures are addressed, future climate shocks will continue to extract escalating economic and social costs.

Cyclone Ditwah offered a real-world test of India’s evolving disaster diplomacy, and New Delhi’s actions suggest a deliberate move beyond symbolic assistance toward institutionalised regional crisis leadership.

The decision by Prime Minister Narendra Modi to send External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar as a Special Envoy, rather than relying solely on diplomatic channels, reflected a calibrated political message: Sri Lanka’s recovery is directly tied to India’s regional stability calculus.

As Sri Lanka now shifts its attention to the next phase, India has assured that India will extend all possible support as a trusted partner and a reliable friend. Prime Minister Modi stated in his letter 

As in the past, we will stand shoulder to shoulder with you in rebuilding lives and ensuring resilience in Sri Lanka. In this context,he added.

The letter explicitly framed India’s intervention within its First Responder commitment, a doctrine that has steadily evolved since the Indian Ocean tsunami and gained operational maturity through recent regional disasters.

 Continuing the goodwill gesture, India has committed a comprehensive reconstruction assistance package worth $ 450 million to support Sri Lanka’s recovery from the devastation caused by Cyclone Ditwah,

‘Operation Sagar Bandhu’ demonstrated how India now integrates its naval, air, medical, and technical capacities into a single response mechanism.

Indian ships and aircraft ensured rapid delivery of relief supplies, while helicopters supported access to isolated areas. Medical teams and communication specialists addressed critical gaps in emergency healthcare and connectivity, often the weakest links in post-disaster environments.

What distinguishes this intervention is its continuity. The Prime Minister’s letter clearly signals that India’s role will not end with emergency relief.

The proposed comprehensive assistance package, now under discussion with Sri Lankan authorities, points to a medium-term recovery approach aligned with infrastructure restoration, livelihood support, and resilience-building.

From a diplomatic standpoint, Dr. Jaishankar’s engagement reinforced India’s preference for bilateral trust-based cooperation rather than transactional aid. This approach contrasts with multilateral assistance frameworks, which while essential often struggle with speed and ground-level coordination during acute crises.

The timing of the visit also carries economic significance. Sri Lanka remains vulnerable to external shocks, and disaster-related disruptions can quickly translate into fiscal stress. India’s rapid intervention indirectly cushions these pressures by stabilising essential services and reducing immediate recovery costs.

Equally important is the political symbolism. By addressing President Anura Kumara Dissanayake directly and publicly reaffirming India’s long-term commitment, New Delhi strengthened leadership-level rapport at a moment when policy alignment and confidence-building are crucial.

Cyclone Ditwah has thus become a case study in how regional powers can operationalise solidarity. India’s response illustrates a shift from episodic assistance to a structured, predictable support model one that may well define future crisis engagement in South Asia.